End of Time

End of Time

This is a phrase I have heard many times as I grew and was privy to the teachings of many different churches.  I heard my mother, friends, neighbors, and strangers use this phrase.  But, is it a concept that we cannot really even begin to comprehend?  I'm not totally sure, but God does not exist in the linear sense we are accustomed to and in fact time is not a boundary or true descriptor of God and His existence.  It is written that He is from everlasting to everlasting and also that he is Alpha and Omega the beginning and the end.  It is from this last statement that I perceive the concept of the "end of time" is born.  But, again here, I must ask if God is from everlasting to everlasting, how does this "end" fit into things? 

There is one word that somewhat encompasses my meager understanding in this area and that word is relative.  I'm not speaking of kinship but rather a relationship between God and mankind that we cannot understand, yet it is give to and for us in the terms that we may hopefully understand; terms that will allow us to think and portray everything within the reaches of our limited minds and or the capacity for us to understand God. 

I have heard it compared to trying to explain to a young child about the complex theories of Physics or the deepest thoughts of Theologists [I prefer this term to Theologian] and the relationship between the reality of God and the reality we perceive.  We are afforded guidance so that we may at least break down the concept of endless time or existence into a system (Given us by God) wherewith we track the days, months, years, etc. as defined for us in the Old Testament.  God provided the sun, moon, and stars for our use as a means to know, learn, and be capable of following the instructions God gave mankind - His commandments and the portions that declare the times and seasons for festivals in memorial, as an inherent custom (or requirement) within the capability we have of understanding. In other words, God provided us a celestial clock that is understandable to us to help us find some concrete means of identifying with God.  They are designed to allow us to draw near to God in terms we are capable of knowing and physically capable of performing.  

But getting back to the term end of time, then, it therefore must be a term that only impacts the reality of time as humanity knows it.  I offer that the end of time is not really an end, but the beginning of forever or everlasting when we are given the capability to understand. That time of understanding is when all will be revealed to us and in our translated bodies, in our heavenly bodies or forms, and through the new spirit filled existence in the presence of God. When we are in heaven and all is revealed, what a wondermous event that will be.  We will know all that we have questioned but failed to find an answer and the depth and reach of understanding that is impossible for us to "handle" now.  So, time as God is, has no end and we shall experience that.  The end of time is only pertinent to this earthly existence, to the experience we call life in the world - and a world that will pass away as will all the concepts and understandings we have of our primitive existence. For life in Heaven is anything but primitive, in fact a life we cannot explain in concrete terms, but rather a blink in the eternity we will be part of.  What a wonderful, exciting, and possibly intimidating truth given us through the word of God. 

So, again, the end of time is merely a term we have invented so we can understand the day when tracking time as we know it will not be necessary because once we are part of eternity there is no "time" as we think of it now.

Is it then not a difference between science and theology or rather a harmonized symbiotic relationship between them specifically for our benefit?  I favor the latter...

 

Rate0

Replies

Sorry but you must be a member of this group to reply to this topic.

This website is powered by Spruz

What Each Area of the Site is Meant For: Blogs - This is your personal space. This is where you should post thoughts that are not intended for extensive further discussion. Observations from personal study and events that have occurred in your life belong here. Unless your post ends with questions or makes it apparent that discussion is to follow, it should probably be a blog. As discussed later, blogs are limited to those who hold to historic Christian beliefs. Forums - This is for open discussion relating to the topic posted. Dialogue is encouraged to stay on topic, so if a side conversation begins, open a new discussion. This is where the majority of the activity has taken place so far. Topics should remain general in nature, while in depth discussion on narrow topics should take place in groups. Groups - This is a place to congregate with people who have similar interests and positions in order to have open discussion. The conversation in here is not required to remain on topic, so it is more ready to follow rabbit trails. This is where you should go if you want to gather with a particular kind of theologian. Before initiating a new group, we ask that you consider posting a question in the discussion forum area to see if there is enough interest to justify a separate group. The reason we encourage such action is that, in the event that a group is inactive for 6 months or more, the moderators of Scriptural Studies reserve the right to close down and delete the group due to inactivity. Events - This is available to anyone that wants to post an event that you think the members of Scriptural Studies may be interested in. Contact Denis, Rabbi Del, Rifkah, or Marti for more details on advertising. Our Attitude of conduct: In case you missed them on your way in, take some time to become acquainted with the conduct we expect on this site. You may find our Attidudes on the main forum page. Our purpose at Scripural Studies is that the conversations move in a Gracious way. We define Gracious in the following way: 1) Not closed minded 2) Not self-promoting 3) Not characterized by mass amounts of cut-and-paste proof-texting 4) Not characterized by mass amounts of cut-and-paste from other places 5) Irenic 6) Not slanderous 7) No spamming 8) Perpetual venting bitterness 9) Not confusing or disruptive But in all things you'll be welcome here